When it comes to estate planning, one common matter of concern is the welfare of a beloved pet. Massachusetts is currently one of only six states that does not allow its residents to write pets into their wills. So even if someone designates a caretaker and sets aside funds for an animal’s care, there is no way to ensure that the money will be used as intended.
Governor Patrick should change this by signing a recently-passed bill that would allow the creation of enforceable pet trust funds. Such funds got a bad name a few years ago, when hotel magnate Leona Helmsley left $12 million to her pet Maltese. But the Massachusetts bill has a provision to prevent that sort of excess, allowing a judge to reduce a trust’s size if it substantially exceeds what’s required for an animal’s care.
Such a measure could actually save at least some public money, since animals who aren’t sent to designated homes often wind up with local animal control. Best of all, it would provide peace of mind for the many people who consider their pets to be part of the family
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2011/01/05/pet_care_where_theres_a_will/














Great idea. We have 2 wonderful, loving people set just in case. Good post
Benny & Lily
I have thought of it many times and really should do that. Thanks for an important and informative post!
Really useful post there.
Thanks
My will has the arrangements made and in case of emergency there is a trusted family member I can count on as well.
Thanks for sharing. I have never even thought about writing my pet into my will. I'm just lucky to only have a dog that isn't very high maintenance and we already know some family members that would gladly take him if something would ever happen. =)